WHO IS THE KING OF THE CASTLE?
The Rev. Harold Shepherd, CD, M.A., S.T.M., LL.B., LL.M., Ph.D.
Sermon from September 21, 2003


Then they came to Capernaum; and when he was in the house he asked them, "What were you arguing about on the way?" But they were silent, for on the way they had argued with one another who was the greatest. He sat down, called the twelve, and said to them, "Whoever wants to be first must be last of all and servant of all." Then he took a little child and put it among them; and taking it in his arms, he said to them, "Whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me, and whoever welcomes me welcomes not me but the one who sent me." Mark 9:33-37

Who is greatest in the Kingdom of God? Human nature being what it is, this was a burning question for Jesus’ disciples. Within the social structure of the day, the hierarchy of power, influence and prestige was in the form of a pyramid with the Emperor at the top and various forms of outcasts at the bottom. It was important to know one’s place in society and to respect one’s betters. Based on social conventions relating to ancestry, employment, rank and class background, one could establish who was greater than whom. The disciples tried to do the same thing. Jesus would have none of it.

As human beings, our motives are often mixed. By way of example, I picked up a copy of the Spanish language daily El Popular at the subway of September 16 and came across an article about Mexican independence celebrated on that day. As is well-known, the Spanish conquistador, Hernan Cortes, arrived in Mexico in 1521 with 500 Spanish soldiers. With the help of first nations who had been conquered by the Aztecs and looked to the Spanish for liberation, he succeeded in defeating the Aztecs and incorporating Mexico into the Spanish Empire. Like Roman society of Jesus’ day, Spanish Colonial society was also highly stratified. The King was, of course, at the top, followed by Spaniards born in Spain (Peninsulares), then by people of Spanish ancestry born in the colonies (Criollos), then those of mixed Spanish/ native birth (Mestizos), followed by first nations (Indios). The Church was politically conservative, siding with Spanish-born Peninsulares and land-owners to resist change to this hierarchical structure. After all, it worked well if you were rich, was not so endearing for the landless peasants. In 1808, Napoleon conquered Spain and appointed his brother Jose Bonaparte as King of Spain(1808- 1810). Sensing weakness on the part of the Spanish Crown, the Creoles found that circumstances were right to try to obtain independence. These were the people who felt that they were being treated as second-class citizens in the country of their birth by foreigners who looked down their nose on them as being mere colonials. They had enough of this and decided to do something about it. Influenced by the ideas of liberty, equality and democracy by such people as Rousseau, Voltaire, and John Locke that had inspired the French and American Revolutions, they plotted one of their own. A group comprising one priest, one lawyer, four army officers, two land-owners and some others met under the name of the “Literary Society” to discuss more than books. The secretary of the group and one of the army officers reported their plan to Spanish authorities. The wife of a Spanish official found out about the betrayal and promptly sent word to the conspirators who were in the town of Dolores at the time. One of the conspirators was Father Hidalgo, the parish priest of Dolores. He rang the Church bell at 5:00 a.m. on September 16 to invite the town to a mass. He and Captain Allende used the occasion to call the people to arms against the Spanish government and the Peninsulares. On that morning, he made a famous Cry of Independence. Different versions of it are circulated, all beginning with “Long live Our Lady of Guadalupe! Death to bad government!” Every year at 11:00 p.m. on September 15, a public official goes to the town square to repeat the Cry of Independence, but with Viva Mexico! The tradition in Mexico City is for the President of the Republic to do this in the Zolcolo, or central square. This kicks of the celebration of the Mexican declaration and war of independence. However, independence was not achieved until September 27, 1821 when the Treaty of Cordoba was signed, recognizing Mexico as an independent state.

Many countries in the world owe their independence as a state to armed conflict. We celebrate July 1, the day an Imperial Parliament proclaimed a law passed in Westminster. We cherish freedom, and many have died trying to achieve it or protect it. But, how much of this is designed to establish true equality, liberty and social justice through serving others, and how much is motivated by fighting to either preserve social structures that favour the rich and powerful or to take them over? What were the motives of the Mexican revolutionaries? This is not always easy to discern. As we approach two elections between now and November, we have the opportunity to listen to promises, ask hard questions, and use our vote to promote justice, respect for human dignity and advancement of society as a caring and compassionate community. Our bishops have done so in a letter addressed to Anglicans in Ontario, and speak to issues of housing and homelessness, faith education in the public school system, and government-sponsored gambling. You can find the document on the Diocese of Toronto web site at (third item under News/ Announcements). I commend this document to you as you reflect on the issues facing us as both Christians and citizens as we seek to build an inclusive community that leaves no one behind through a quest to be the greatest in the Province.